New Stakes for Cyber-Resiliency in the Era of Cyberwarfare
- Date:January 30, 2025
- Author(s):
- Tracy Kitten
- Report Details: 12 pages, 4 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Cybersecurity
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
The intricate network of cybercrime and nation-state threats that often intertwine and overlap can be fully identified and traced only by true cross-sector intelligence sharing. Yet cyberwarfare continues to be a mysterious black box when it comes to cyber risks that should be on the radars of financial institutions. Governments are obviously concerned about cyber risks linked to espionage, misinformation campaigns, elections, and a host of ancillary concerns, such as terrorism and human trafficking. But what about the risks to critical infrastructure, under which financial services fall?
The war in Ukraine, the Iran-Israel conflict, and increasing tension between the United States and China have raised new concerns and emphasis around geopolitical risks. Attacks against the U.S. financial infrastructure undoubtedly are a sweet spot for those adversaries, which aim to rock U.S. consumer trust in the financial ecosystem and raise questions about consumer privacy protections. Javelin has encouraged its FI clients to partner with vendors, particularly on the identity verification/identity-proofing side, that pool consortium data from multiple sources to verify the authenticity of identities (see 2024 Authentication and Identity-Proofing Vendor Solutions Scorecard).
This report explores why national cybersecurity orders will never secure real results for cyber resiliency. It looks at steps financial institutions can take to reverse poor decisions made in previous tech investments that will benefit and strengthen cyber resiliency and reduce ongoing risk. It also considers why and how the cyber threat and risk landscape expands exponentially through consumers, employees, and the supply chain.
Key questions discussed in this report:
- Why can’t national cybersecurity orders secure real results for cyber resiliency?
- Why are financial institutions continually failing to make tech investments in solutions that will benefit and strengthen cyber resiliency that reduces ongoing risk?
- How is the cyber threat and risk landscape expanding exponentially, through consumers, employees, and the supply chain?
Companies mentioned:
ByteDance, DeepSeek, GBG, ID Mission, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Mastercard, Netki, TikTok
Learn More About This Report & Javelin
Related content
2025 Cybersecurity Trends
Expanding security automation by relying more heavily on security orchestration, artificial intelligence, and data analytics, as well as a more inclusive and expansive definition o...
Threat Intel Odyssey: Mapping the Convergence of Social Cyber Risks
Successful sharing of threat intelligence must move beyond the borders of traditional financial services and governments to include social media, a breeding ground for cybercrime a...
2024 Cyber Trust in Banking Scorecard
In this scorecard, Javelin evaluates leading financial institutions’ level of cyber trust based on key components: privacy, cybersecurity, education and resolution support. Shiftin...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world