New Stakes for Cyber Resiliency in the Era of Cyberwarfare
- Date:January 30, 2025
- Author(s):
- Tracy (Kitten) Goldberg
- Report Details: 12 pages, 4 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Cybersecurity
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
The intricate network of cybercrime and nation-state threats that often intertwine and overlap can be fully identified and traced only by true cross-sector intelligence sharing. Yet cyberwarfare continues to be a mysterious black box when it comes to cyber risks that should be on the radars of financial institutions. Governments are obviously concerned about cyber risks linked to espionage, misinformation campaigns, elections, and a host of ancillary concerns, such as terrorism and human trafficking. But what about the risks to critical infrastructure, under which financial services fall?
The war in Ukraine, the Iran-Israel conflict, and increasing tension between the United States and China have raised new concerns and emphasis around geopolitical risks. Attacks against the U.S. financial infrastructure undoubtedly are a sweet spot for those adversaries, which aim to rock U.S. consumer trust in the financial ecosystem and raise questions about consumer privacy protections. Javelin has encouraged its FI clients to partner with vendors, particularly on the identity verification/identity-proofing side, that pool consortium data from multiple sources to verify the authenticity of identities (see 2024 Authentication and Identity-Proofing Vendor Solutions Scorecard).
This report explores why national cybersecurity orders will never secure real results for cyber resiliency. It looks at steps financial institutions can take to reverse poor decisions made in previous tech investments that will benefit and strengthen cyber resiliency and reduce ongoing risk. It also considers why and how the cyberthreat and risk landscape expands exponentially through consumers, employees, and the supply chain.
Key questions discussed in this Cybersecurity report:
- Why can’t national cybersecurity orders secure real results for cyber resiliency?
- Why are financial institutions continually failing to make tech investments in solutions that will benefit and strengthen cyber resiliency that reduces ongoing risk?
- How is the cyberthreat and risk landscape expanding exponentially, through consumers, employees, and the supply chain?
Companies mentioned:
ByteDance, DeepSeek, GBG, ID Mission, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Mastercard, Netki, TikTok
×
Book a Meeting with the Author
Related content
States of Uncertainty: How Cyber-Threat Intel Reduces Digital Transactional Risk
Digital identity standards, privacy laws, and verification tools vary across states, so financial institutions have gaps that cybercriminals are quick to exploit. Leading organizat...
2026 Direct-to-Consumer Identity Protection Services Vendor Scorecard
Gen Digital, provider of Norton 360 with LifeLock Ultimate Plus, took Best in Class in overall identity theft protection sold directly to consumers, followed by Equifax, provider o...
2026 Direct-to-Consumer Identity Protection Services Overview: Gains, Gaps, and Opportunities for Industry Growth
Javelin Strategy & Research’s biennial assessment of direct-to-consumer identity theft protection services (IDPS) vendors finds that they are expanding their services. They are off...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world