Prepaid Card Regulation for College Students: Addressing the Needs of Future Banking Customers
- Date:July 22, 2014
- Author(s):
- Nick Holland
- Aleia Van Dyke
- Report Details: 37 pages, 13 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Tech & Infrastructure
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
The CARD Act of 2009 severely limited the once-pervasive trend of issuing credit cards to college students, and some issuers turned to prepaid cards to continue providing cards to college campuses. Fast forward to 2014, regulators are once again proposing regulations for college cards that could dramatically alter payments for students. Card issuers are particularly focused on students because they soon will become financially independent and evolve into important banking customers. Today, 23% of students own a general-purpose reloadable (GPR) prepaid card and approximately 107 colleges offer a campus-specific prepaid card to students. This report examines the controversial regulatory environment for campus prepaid cards and recommends how issuers and universities can best manage potential regulation. This report also analyzes the unique financial needs of today’s college students and offers insight into how providers can best help young customers and build long-term financial relationships.
Primary Questions:
- How have recent regulations fueled the growth of prepaid cards on and off college campuses?
- What is the current regulatory environment for campus prepaid cards?
- What are the financial needs of today’s college students?
- How can card issuers best serve college students while remaining profitable?
- How can campus prepaid issuers improve their college card programs?
- Who are the winners and losers of campus prepaid cards?
Companies Mentioned
American Express | Blackboard Pay | Discover |
Heartland | Mastercard | U.S. Bank |
Barnes & Noble | Citibank | Fifth Third Bank |
Higher One | PNC Bank | Visa |
Press Release
University-Issued Prepaid Cards Face the Regulatory Firing Squad
Methodology
- A random-sample panel of 3,509 consumers in November 2013
- A random-sample panel of 6,000 consumers in May 2014
- A random-sample panel of 3,212 consumers in September 2013
Learn More About This Report & Javelin
Related content
Navigating 1033: Technology Considerations for the New Rules of the Road
The long-awaited final rules under Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 present technology departments and tech leadership with a n...
Demystifying Payment Orchestration for Banks
Payment orchestration for banks is fundamentally about lowering costs, increasing efficiency, and creating better customer journeys. The process of building orchestration architect...
Banking as a Service and Self-Inflicted Wounds
The “unbundling” of financial services through banking-as-a-service arrangements cast risk and compliance into a gray area. This was underscored by the failure of BaaS provider Syn...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world