The Future of Cardholder Verification Methods
- Date:August 19, 2016
- Author(s):
- Test
- Kyle Marchini
- Report Details: 34 pages, 13 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Fraud Management
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
With the U.S. well on its way to adopting the EMV chip card standard, fraud at the point of sale will not disappear. Lost/stolen fraud, mail interception, and account takeover are just a few ways fraudsters can gain access to physical cards. But with consumer expectations around financial services in general and transactions in particular being increasingly defined by their mobile experiences, issuers and merchants cannot afford to add friction during transactions. Meeting these challenges requires a multidimensional approach to cardholder verification relying on rich customer intelligence, friction-free risk evaluation, and on-device authentication.
Key questions addressed in this report:
- What are the primary fraud threats to cards at the point of sale in a post-EMV U.S.?
- What requirements must new point-of-sale authentication tools meet?
- How can issuers boost security at the point of sale without imposing onerous authentication requirements on their customers?
- How can issuers create a unified security experience across all transaction channels: point of sale, online, and mobile?
- What unique opportunities do mobile devices offer in boosting transaction security?
Companies Mentioned: Apple, Capital One, EyeLock, EyeVerify, Fujitsu, Google, Home Depot, MasterCard, Microsoft, Ondot, Samsung, SmartMetric, Target, Visa, Wells Fargo, Zwipe
Methodology
Consumer data in this report is based on information collected in random-sample panel surveys of:
- 5,111 consumers in an October/November 2015 survey. The margin of sampling error is ±1.37 percentage points for questions answered by all respondents.
- 10,639 consumers in a May 2016 survey. The margin of sampling error is ±0.95 percentage points for questions answered by all respondents.
- 3,200 consumers in an October 2015 survey. The margin of sampling error is ±1.73 percentage points for questions answered by all respondents.
- 3,195 consumers in a June/July 2015 survey. The margin of sampling error is ±1.73 percentage points for questions answered by all respondents.
Book a Meeting with the Author
Related content
2027 Fraud Management Trends
This report focuses on three major trends in 2027 with far-reaching ramifications: shifting scam liability, emerging liability frameworks for agentic commerce, and the governance o...
Elder Fraud: New Bills, Persistent Gaps
Much of the attention surrounding elder fraud concentrates on scams, but identity fraud and trusted-person financial exploitation also pose serious risks to older adults. These dif...
Sharing is Caring: The Fraud ‘Consortium’ Effect
Financial institutions are slowly realizing that sharing fraud data is a necessary response to the rise of well-organized fraudsters who target multiple financial institutions simu...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world