2019 ATM Security: Taking a Holistic Approach to Protecting the Automated Teller Machine
- Date:February 04, 2019
- Author(s):
- Sean Sposito
- Report Details: 21 pages, 8 graphics
- Research Topic(s):
- Cybersecurity
- Fraud & Security
- PAID CONTENT
Overview
Despite criminal innovations, the simplest way to illegally withdraw cash from a bank is to exploit the weaknesses inherent in the business and operation of automated teller machines (ATMs). Whether criminals are organized internationally or domestically, the accessibility of mass-produced plastic cards, the limited number of ATM vendors, and a patchwork of fixes that safeguard devices in a piecemeal fashion have created the opportunity for prolific crimes.
Crimes at cash machines should be expected given the trillions of dollars dispensed from ATMs each year. A single cassette can carry as much as one million dollars in cash — amounts unseen in brick-and-mortar, retail branches.
This report will break down into two categories the risks that ATMs face: logical attacks that focus on the weaknesses embedded within the device’s software and operating systems, and physical ones that involve crooks breaking locks to cash dispensers.
Key questions discussed in this report:
- How great a role will ATM investments play in the business plans of financial institutions (FIs)?
- What is the state of the ATM threat landscape?
- What solutions best combat those threats?
- What obstacles exist to implementing those solutions?
Companies Mentioned: Apple, Bank of America, Co-Op Financial Services, FIS, Google, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo
Methodology
Javelin conducted a series of interviews involving industry and vendor executives, attorneys and other relevant stakeholders to gain an understanding of the topic. Interviewees represented a variety of organizations.
Data in this report is based on information collected in a random-sample panel of 800 information technology security decision-makers, 200 of whom work in financial services. For questions answered by all 800 survey respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±3.46 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. For questions answered by all 200 financial services respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±6.93 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. The maximum margin of sampling error is higher for questions answered by segments of respondents.
Book a Meeting with the Author
Related content
2026 Business-to-Business Identity Protection Services Vendor Scorecard: Platform Integration and Scam-Loss Coverage Set the New Bar for B2B Identity Protection
Business-to-business identity protection is moving beyond conventional monitoring toward embedded, household-wide financial safety and cybersecurity. Javelin’s inaugural B2B identi...
Card Account Updaters and Digital Wallets: The Hidden Cyber Advantage for Crime
Infostealers are changing the rules of payments card risk. Replacing a compromised card may be an immediate fix, but it does not cut off access to compromised merchant accounts and...
States of Uncertainty: How Cyber-Threat Intel Reduces Digital Transactional Risk
Digital identity standards, privacy laws, and verification tools vary across states, so financial institutions have gaps that cybercriminals are quick to exploit. Leading organizat...
Make informed decisions in a digital financial world